GOMORs — What They Are, Your Rebuttal Rights

// 01The regulation, verbatim

unfavorable information will be shared with the recipient for acknowledgment of his or her rebuttal opportunity, prior to filing. Recipients will be provided 7 calendar days (active duty Soldiers (all components) or USAR Soldiers in Troop Program Units (TPUs)), or 30 calendar days (Army National Guard/Reserve Soldiers not on active duty) to make a statement, or to decline, in writing, to make such a statement.

AR 600-37 ¶3-7a-b, p.6

The statement may include evidence that rebuts, explains, or mitigates the unfavorable information

AR 600-37 ¶3-7a-b, p.6

There are only two filing options: filing in the performance portion of the AMHRR, or local filing. Commanders do not have the option to file memoranda in the restricted portion.

AR 600-37 ¶3-5a, p.5

reviewed and considered by the officer authorized to direct filing... before a final determination is made to file the memorandum

AR 600-37 ¶3-5c(1)(d)

// 02What this means in practice

Let's get the vocabulary right first, because it matters: AR 600-37 never actually uses the word "GOMOR." Its term is "memorandum of reprimand, admonition, or censure." GOMOR is just the informal shorthand everybody uses for a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand — but functionally, everything the regulation says applies whether the memo came from a general officer or your battalion commander. What you're holding is a commander's written statement that you did something wrong, and it is about to become part of your permanent record unless you engage with the process in front of you.

Here's the part people miss under stress: you don't just get handed a GOMOR and lose. The regulation builds in a rebuttal opportunity, and it's not optional on the command's end — unfavorable information has to be shared with you specifically "for acknowledgment of his or her rebuttal opportunity, prior to filing." That sequencing is deliberate. Filing comes after you've had your say, not before.

The clock that matters: you get 7 calendar days if you're active duty (any component) or in a USAR Troop Program Unit. If you're Guard or Reserve and not on active duty, you get 30 calendar days. Notice these are calendar days, not duty days — weekends and holidays count. That's a shorter runway than it feels like when you're staring at the memo in shock. Don't sit on it. Start drafting the day you sign for it.

Now, what can you actually put in that statement? The regulation's language is precise, and this is where a lot of Soldiers get the terminology tangled with Article 15 rights — don't. Article 15 statements run on "defense, extenuation, mitigation." This is a different right, under a different regulation, with different language: your statement "may include evidence that rebuts, explains, or mitigates the unfavorable information." Three lanes, and they're not identical to each other:

- Rebuts — you're contesting the facts. You didn't do it, or the facts as stated are wrong or incomplete. This is where you attach evidence: sworn statements, documents, anything that undercuts the factual basis of the reprimand.
- Explains — you're not denying what happened, but you're giving context the commander didn't have when they wrote it. Maybe there's a fuller story. This lane is about completing the picture, not erasing it.
- Mitigates — you're not disputing the facts or adding context so much as making the case for why this shouldn't follow you the way it's currently positioned to. Your record, your duty performance, the totality of who you are as a Soldier — that's mitigation.

A strong rebuttal often uses more than one lane. You can rebut a specific factual claim AND explain the surrounding circumstances AND make a mitigation argument about your record, all in the same statement. What you should not do is submit something purely emotional with no evidence attached, or something that reads as an excuse rather than an argument. The commander authorized to direct filing has to review and consider your statement "before a final determination is made to file the memorandum" — so write it like it's actually going to be read by someone deciding your future, because it is.

Filing is the other half of this you need to understand before you write a word. There are only two places a GOMOR can go: the performance portion of your AMHRR, or local filing. That's it — commanders do not have the option to file it in the restricted portion, so don't waste your rebuttal arguing for a restricted-file outcome that isn't on the table. What you're actually fighting for, in practice, is local filing instead of performance-portion filing, or no filing at all if your rebuttal is strong enough. Local filing isn't permanent either — it maxes out at 18 months before it has to come out of your file.

One more thing that trips people up: silence doesn't protect you. If you decline to respond, or you don't respond at all, the reprimanding official documents that refusal and the memorandum can then be directed for filing anyway. Not responding doesn't pause the process or buy you time — it just means the file moves forward without your side of the story in it. If you're going to decline, that has to be a deliberate, informed decision, ideally made after talking to legal counsel, not a default that happens because you didn't act inside the window.

Bottom line: you have a real right here, it has a hard deadline, and the regulation tells you exactly what kind of statement it's looking for. Use all three lanes if they apply, attach evidence where you have it, and get it in before the clock runs out.

// 03What most get wrong

The single biggest mistake is treating the GOMOR rebuttal like an Article 15 statement — reaching for "defense, extenuation, and mitigation" language, or worse, treating the whole thing like a court proceeding where you're arguing innocence. AR 600-37 isn't asking for a defense; it's asking for a statement that "rebuts, explains, or mitigates." That's a different, and honestly broader, invitation than people realize. You don't have to prove you didn't do it to write an effective rebuttal — explaining context or making a mitigation case about your record both count, and both can change the outcome.

The second mistake is treating the deadline casually. 7 or 30 calendar days sounds like a lot until you're also dealing with the emotional weight of getting reprimanded, plus trying to track down evidence, plus possibly waiting on legal assistance appointments. That clock does not stop for any of that.

The corrective takeaway: the moment you're notified, start two things simultaneously — request a legal assistance appointment (this falls squarely in AR 27-3's required legal assistance coverage) and start drafting factual notes while the incident is fresh, before you've even decided your angle. You can revise the argument later; you can't recreate the details you forgot to write down on day one.

// 04Regulations cited in this lesson

• AR 600-37 ¶3-7a-b, p.6
• AR 600-37 ¶3-5a, p.5
• AR 600-37 ¶3-5c(1)(d)

// 05More in Adverse Actions: What Every Soldier Should Know

• What a Flag Actually Is and Does
• Article 15 — Your Rights, Defense/Extenuation/Mitigation, and Appeal
• When to Get a Lawyer — the Legal Assistance Program

← All Academy lessons