How to Respond to a GOMOR: Your Rebuttal Rights Under AR 600-37

This is not legal advice. A GOMOR can carry real, career-ending consequences, and no article (this one included) knows your case. You are solely responsible for what you submit. Before you respond to a GOMOR, consult qualified legal counsel. Under AR 27-3, unfavorable information matters (AR 600-37) are among the services Army legal assistance offices handle, and that consult costs you nothing. Use it.

I’ve walked Soldiers through this process from the receiving end for years, and the pattern I’ve seen over and over is that the regulation gives you a real, time-boxed opportunity, and most people either don’t know what it’s for or burn it on the wrong argument. So let’s walk the regulation.

// 01What a GOMOR actually is

First, a terminology note that matters when you go reading the source: AR 600-37 (Unfavorable Information) never uses the word “GOMOR.” The regulation’s term is a memorandum of reprimand, admonition, or censure. “GOMOR” (General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand) is the field’s name for the version signed by a general officer. It is an administrative action, not a punishment under the UCMJ. But don’t let “administrative” fool you. What decides its long-term weight is where it gets filed.

// 02The filing decision: two options, not three

Under AR 600-37 ¶3-5a, there are exactly two filing options for a reprimand:

• The performance portion of your AMHRR: your permanent record, visible to boards.
• Local filing: held at the local level, with a maximum local filing period of 18 months (¶3-5e).

Commanders do not have the option of filing a reprimand in the restricted portion of the AMHRR. The regulation forecloses it. So the practical stakes of the whole process compress into one question: performance-fiche AMHRR, or local. A locally filed memo has a bounded life. A performance-filed memo follows you to every board.

// 03The rebuttal window

Before that filing decision is final, AR 600-37 ¶3-7 requires that the unfavorable information be shared with you for acknowledgment of your rebuttal opportunity, prior to filing. The windows:

• 7 calendar days: active duty Soldiers (all components) and USAR Soldiers in Troop Program Units.
• 30 calendar days: Army National Guard and Reserve Soldiers not on active duty.

Within that window you may make a statement, or decline in writing to make one. And here’s the part that makes the window worth taking seriously: per ¶3-5c, rebuttal statements are reviewed and considered by the officer authorized to direct filing before a final determination is made. Your statement lands on the desk of the person deciding between AMHRR and local filing, before they decide. That is the entire strategic point of the rebuttal.

// 04What a rebuttal may contain

The regulation defines the content lanes in one line: the statement “may include evidence that rebuts, explains, or mitigates the unfavorable information” (AR 600-37 ¶3-7). Three lanes:

• Rebut: evidence the underlying information is wrong: documents, records, statements from people who were there.
• Explain: context the deciding officer doesn’t have: what actually happened, in order, with the facts that never made it into the packet.
• Mitigate: evidence that bears on weight and filing: your record, your performance history, statements from your chain about who you’ve been before and since.

Beyond those three words, AR 600-37 prescribes no template and no required format for the statement itself, which is worth knowing, because anyone selling you a “mandatory GOMOR rebuttal format” is selling packaging, not regulation. What I can tell you from experience (as practice, not as a regulatory requirement) is that strong rebuttals stay factual, stay inside those three lanes, attach evidence rather than adjectives, and are reviewed by counsel before submission. Angry rebuttals that attack the issuing officer or relitigate everything at once tend to read as confirmation of the problem.

// 05Common mistakes

Refusing to acknowledge, thinking it stops the process.

It doesn’t. Under ¶3-7c, if the recipient refuses to acknowledge, the official documents the refusal and the memorandum can then be directed for filing. Declining to engage doesn’t block anything. It just means the filing decision gets made without your side in the file.

Missing the window.

Seven calendar days (not duty days) goes fast, especially if you spend five of them deciding whether to respond. Get to legal assistance immediately, not on day six.

Writing pure denial when the lane is mitigation.

If the underlying facts are substantiated and provable, a rebuttal built entirely on “it didn’t happen” spends your one reading on an argument the deciding officer can dismiss with the enclosures. The regulation gives you three lanes for a reason. Counsel can help you pick the one your facts actually support.

Assuming a filed memo is the end of the road.

The pre-filing rebuttal is the front door, but AR 600-37 Chapter 7 provides a separate, later appeal process through the Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB) for memoranda already filed. That is a distinct process from the ¶3-7 rebuttal, with its own standards: another conversation to have with counsel, not a reason to skip the rebuttal window.

// 06Where BulletForge fits

BulletForge’s Flags & Adverse Actions tools include a GOMOR rebuttal drafter: it takes your facts (your timeline, your evidence, your record) and helps you structure them into the rebut / explain / mitigate lanes the regulation defines, in clean Army memorandum format. It drafts from what you give it; it doesn’t invent facts, and it doesn’t replace the legal review you should get before anything goes in your file.

Facing an Article 15 instead of (or alongside) a reprimand? That’s a different regulation with different rights and different clocks: the Article 15 statement and appeal guide.

Not legal advice. You are solely responsible for what you submit. Consult qualified legal counsel.

← Back to The Field Manual